Discernment of Spirits: An Ignation Guide for Clinical Practice

What Ignatius actually built

The Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius of Loyola are not a devotional text for private reading. Ignatius designed them as a set of instructions — for meditations, examens, contemplations, and deliberative methods — that a director gives to a retreatant who then carries them out.[^1] The Exercises are, in Ignatius's own phrase, a means of "preparing and disposing the soul to rid itself of all disordered attachments, and, after their removal, of seeking and finding the will of God in the disposition of one's life."[^2]

At the center of that process sits discernment of spirits: the capacity to identify which interior movements (thoughts, feelings, impulses, images) draw a person toward God and genuine human flourishing, and which draw them away. Ignatius codified this capacity in two sets of rules found in the Exercises (Rules for the First Week and Rules for the Second Week), and it is these rules, more than any other element of his system, that translate most directly into a clinical context.

The two movements: consolation and desolation

Ignatius names two primary categories of interior experience. Consolation is any increase in faith, hope, and love; any interior joy that draws the person toward God; any quiet of soul, peace, or tears arising from love of God. Desolation is the opposite: darkness of soul, disturbance, movement toward low and earthly things, restlessness, tepidity, and a sense of separation from God.[^3]

Three clarifications matter for clinical work.

First, consolation and desolation are not synonyms for pleasant and unpleasant affect. A person can experience deep sorrow over sin while in a state of consolation — the sorrow is ordered, orienting, productive of growth. A person can feel pleasant relief after avoiding a hard conversation and be in desolation — the comfort is disordered, closing rather than opening the self. Clinicians trained in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy will recognize the structural parallel: Hayes distinguishes psychological flexibility from mere hedonic comfort, noting that valued action often involves discomfort while avoidance often feels temporarily pleasant.[^4] Ignatius is making a cognate distinction, grounded in a teleological anthropology rather than a functional one.

Second, Ignatius specifies that the same interior movement means different things depending on the person's spiritual condition. For someone moving away from God, the evil spirit uses apparent pleasures and sensory gratifications to keep them in their faults; the good spirit uses remorse and conscience. For someone genuinely seeking God, the dynamic reverses: the good spirit gives consolation, courage, and ease, while the evil spirit causes anxiety, sadness, and obstacles.[^3] In clinical terms: the diagnostic question is not only "what is the client feeling?" but "in what direction is this person moving, and what does this feeling do to that direction?"

Third, Ignatius warns explicitly against making permanent decisions during desolation. "In time of desolation one should never make a change."[^3] This is structural wisdom, not passivity. Desolation narrows perception, exaggerates difficulty, and makes the present state feel permanent. The therapeutic parallel is well-documented: depressive and anxious states systematically distort cost-benefit assessments, making withdrawal feel like the only option. Ignatius names the same phenomenon five centuries earlier and prescribes the same clinical intervention: do not act from the constricted state, increase counter-movements (prayer, penance, examination), and trust that desolation is temporary.

The agere contra: acting against the movement

One of Ignatius's most practically transferable concepts is the agere contra, acting against the disordered movement. When desolation produces an impulse to withdraw, isolate, or abandon a commitment, the Ignatian response is to move deliberately in the opposite direction: increase rather than decrease prayer, seek rather than avoid community, persist rather than abandon. This is behavioral activation in virtue-formation language. It acknowledges that waiting to feel motivated before acting is itself a desolation strategy; action reshapes affect, not the other way around.

Vitz, Nordling, and Titus ground this anthropologically in the CCMMP: the fallen person experiences concupiscence as disordered desire, a gravitational pull away from the good that will not simply yield to insight.[^5] Transformation requires ordered practice, what Aquinas calls the formation of habit through repeated acts, and the agere contra is precisely the repeated act that begins to reorder appetite. The clinician's role is to help the client act rightly in the presence of disordered feeling, not to wait until the client feels ready to make the right choice, with the understanding that the feeling will shift as the action becomes habitual.

The First and Second Week rules: a clinical tiering

Ignatius distinguishes two levels of discernment, corresponding to the First and Second Weeks of the Exercises.

The First Week rules apply to people who are in serious moral disorder or who are beginners in the spiritual life. The movements are relatively easy to read: gross consolation and gross desolation operate as clear signals. Clinically, this tier maps onto clients whose presenting problems involve active addiction, serious moral compromises, or significant detachment from their own conscience. The task here is basic differentiation: helping the client recognize that some interior states lead toward life and others toward destruction, and building the observational capacity to notice which is which.

The Second Week rules apply to people who are more advanced and who can be deceived by a subtler mechanism Ignatius calls the "angel of light": the capacity of the disordered spirit to begin with something genuinely good and then gradually draw the person toward its own ends. A person may begin a course of action with genuine generosity and then find, through a slow drift, that what started as service has become self-promotion. The feelings remain pleasant throughout; the person receives apparent consolations. Ignatius calls this discretio spirituum at its most demanding: distinguishing not whether a movement is pleasant or painful, but whether, when traced to its source and followed to its conclusion, it genuinely builds toward God and the common good.

Clinically, this second tier is relevant to clients who are functioning well and spiritually engaged but experiencing subtle deterioration in their relationships, prayer, or honesty. It is also relevant to the clinician's own interior life in session: the impulse to soften a difficult truth, to extend a session beyond boundaries for a client one is drawn to, to prefer a formulation that avoids conflict — these are Second Week desolations dressed as consolations.

The examen as clinical tool

The Daily Examen, the Ignatian practice of reviewing the day's interior movements in prayer, is the ongoing maintenance structure for discernment. It involves five movements: gratitude, petition for clarity, review of the day's consolations and desolations, an act of sorrow where warranted, and resolution for the next period.

For clinicians working with Catholic Christian clients, assigning the Examen as a between-session practice provides what behavioral activation and CBT homework provide: structured attention to interior experience over time, generating data the client can bring to the next session. The advantage of the Examen over a generic mood log is its teleological frame: the client tracks not simply affect but what the affect is doing, whether it draws them toward or away from God, toward or away from genuine human flourishing. This orients the data collection toward formation rather than symptom management.

The Examen also addresses what Suazo identifies, following Aquinas, as the role of the cogitative sense: the pre-rational estimation that precedes conscious judgment and shapes emotional response.[^6] Much of what clients report as inexplicable anxiety, attraction, or aversion is cogitative rather than propositional. The Examen trains attention to these pre-rational movements without immediately resolving them into concepts, creating the observational space that genuine discernment requires.

Contraindications and clinical cautions

Ignatian discernment is not a standalone treatment and should not replace clinical assessment. Several specific cautions apply.

A client experiencing psychotic symptoms may interpret discernment language in ways that reinforce delusional content — the voice that commands is not the evil spirit but a symptom requiring psychiatric evaluation. Scrupulosity, a recognized clinical presentation in which the conscience is chronically and disproportionately self-accusatory, can be worsened by intensive examination practices without adequate therapeutic support. Ignatius himself knew scrupulous souls and addressed them directly: when someone in this state finds that every action seems sinful, the rule is not to submit to the scruple but to act against it.[^3] The clinician must distinguish the formed conscience from the scrupulous one before assigning examination practices.

Additionally, clients with significant early trauma may find imaginative contemplation, a central Ignatian method, activating rather than integrative. Perry's work on the neurosequential treatment of developmental trauma indicates that top-down cognitive practices are often less effective than bottom-up regulatory approaches in early trauma work.[^7] The clinician should sequence accordingly: stabilization and somatic regulation before interior examination, and interior examination before discernment of subtle movements.

Applied structure for clinical integration

A practical framework for integrating Ignatian discernment in a Catholic Christian counseling context proceeds in four phases.

Phase one: Psychoeducation. Introduce the categories of consolation and desolation, distinguishing them clearly from pleasant and unpleasant affect. Use the client's own language where possible. Establish that the goal is recognition, not immediate resolution.

Phase two: Observation. Assign a simplified Examen, a five-minute nightly review of the day's interior movements, noting one consolation and one desolation and what each was connected to. Review in session weekly.

Phase three: Differentiation. Begin working with the data the Examen generates. Where is desolation producing constriction, withdrawal, or distorted perception? Where is consolation genuine, and where does it cover a disordered attachment? Introduce the First Week rules as a guide.

Phase four: Integration. As the client develops greater interior literacy, introduce the Second Week rules and the concept of the angel of light. Work with the subtler movements: the good impulse that drifts, the generous act that becomes self-serving, the consolation that, traced to its end, does not build toward genuine flourishing.

Throughout, the clinician's stance is that of the Ignatian spiritual director: not imposing a conclusion but creating the conditions under which the person can hear clearly. "It is not much knowledge but the inner feeling and relish of things that fills and satisfies the soul," Ignatius writes.[^1] The art of both direction and therapy is knowing when to speak and when to let the interior movement do its own work.

References

[^1]: Ignatius of Loyola, Spiritual Exercises, Annotation 2; Spanish autograph text, trans. Louis J. Puhl, SJ (Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1951).

[^2]: Ignatius of Loyola, Spiritual Exercises, Annotation 1; Puhl translation.

[^3]: Ignatius of Loyola, Spiritual Exercises, Rules for the Discernment of Spirits, First Week, Rules 1–14; Second Week, Rules 1–8; Puhl translation.

[^4]: Steven C. Hayes, Kirk D. Strosahl, and Kelly G. Wilson, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change, 2nd ed. (New York: Guilford Press, 2012), 96–112.

[^5]: Paul C. Vitz, William Nordling, and Craig Steven Titus, A Catholic Christian Meta-Model of the Person (Sterling, VA: Divine Mercy University Press, 2020), ch. 4.

[^6]: Benjamín Suazo, Psicopatología y mal moral: Una comprensión desde la psicología integral de la persona (Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Finis Terrae, 2019), 88–103.

[^7]: Bruce D. Perry and Maia Szalavitz, The Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog: And Other Stories from a Child Psychiatrist's Notebook (New York: Basic Books, 2006).