When Grief Will Not Move: What Fathers Need to Know About Complicated Bereavement After Losing a Child

There is a weight that fathers who have lost a child carry that most people around them cannot quite see. You may have gone back to work. You may have kept the lawn, attended the school play for your other children, said the right things at the right times. And yet, somewhere beneath all of that, a chasm opened — one that did not close with the months, or the years.

Pope Francis, writing about family grief, quoted a grieving parent who said it plainly: 'It is as if time stops altogether: a chasm opens to engulf both past and future' [^1]. That is not poetry. That is a clinical description, and it is also a theological one.

A 2025 systematic review by Champion and Kilcullen, published in OMEGA — Journal of Death and Dying, gathered the available research on complicated grief in parents bereaved by the accidental death of a child. What the review found will not surprise you if you have lived it. What it names may, however, give you something to hold onto.

What the research found

Complicated grief — sometimes called prolonged grief disorder — is not simply intense sadness that lasts a long time. It is grief that becomes stuck: a state in which the normal integration of loss fails to occur. The bereaved person remains caught in acute yearning, disbelief, or bitterness that does not soften with time, and that actively interferes with the ability to function, to love, to move forward.

Champion and Kilcullen's review focused specifically on parents who lost a child to accidental death — sudden, unforeseeable, violent in its disruption of expectation. Their findings converge on several points that fathers especially need to hear.

First, fathers grieve differently than mothers, and those differences are often misread — by the fathers themselves, by their spouses, by their communities — as not grieving enough. Men are more likely to channel acute grief into action: working longer hours, taking on projects, staying busy. This is not avoidance in a pathological sense; it is one legitimate expression of love under pressure. But when it becomes the only available mode, it can delay the internal work of mourning, leaving the grief to surface later, harder, and in forms that are more difficult to recognize.

Second, accidental death compounds grief in specific ways. There was no preparation, no goodbye. There may be guilt — 'I should have been there' — that has no rational resolution and that sits, unprocessed, at the center of daily life. There may be intrusive images, hypervigilance, a persistent sense that the world is not safe. The research notes a meaningful overlap between complicated grief and the symptom profile of post-traumatic stress.

Third, fathers who lose a child are at measurable risk for social isolation. Men are less likely than women to seek formal support, less likely to articulate the depth of their grief to friends, and more likely to feel that their grief is invisible to others who have turned their pastoral attention primarily toward the mother.

What the Church offers that therapy cannot fully give

None of this means that psychological support is not warranted — it is, and there is no contradiction between seeking it and living in faith. But there is something the faith holds that clinical frameworks, however good, cannot supply on their own.

Aquinas understood grief (tristitia) as a passion that arises when love encounters real loss. Grief is not a failure of faith. It is, in its very intensity, a measure of what was loved. When your son or daughter dies, the grief you feel is proportionate to the love that formed you as a father. The Catholic Christian understanding of the person insists that you are not merely a mind managing emotions — you are a body-soul unity, and that unity was shaped by the relationship with your child. The loss is real, and the grief that follows it is real in exactly the same way.

This matters because one of the quiet temptations for a man of faith is to regard prolonged grief as a spiritual failure — as though trusting in the resurrection should function as an anesthetic. It does not, and it was never meant to. Jesus wept at the tomb of Lazarus (Jn 11:35), even knowing what he was about to do. The tears were not a lapse in faith. They were love expressed through a human body in the face of real loss.

The resurrection is not a reason to skip grief. It is the reason grief does not have the final word.

The shape of healing

Spiritually, the tradition speaks of what John of the Cross called passive purifications — periods in which God works in the soul not through consolation but through an apparent absence, stripping away the self's ordinary supports until what remains is faith in its most naked form. Fathers who have lost a child often describe an experience that sounds exactly like this: prayer that feels empty, a sense of distance from God precisely when they most need him near, the words of the liturgy arriving at the ear without penetrating anything.

This is not a sign that God has abandoned you. It may be the most interior moment of your entire life as a believer. The darkness has a shape, and the shape is purgative — not punitive.

For the integration of loss to occur — what the psychological literature calls 'meaning-making' — a father needs several things at once. He needs to feel that his grief is seen and acknowledged, not rushed past. He needs spaces in which it is permissible to speak about his child: not to manage that memory, but to keep it living. He needs, at some point, to find that his love for the child does not disappear when he is no longer acutely suffering — that love survives the acute phase of grief and becomes something one carries rather than something that crushes.

This is what the Aparecida document means when it says that from the family 'we receive life and the first experience of love and faith' [^2]. The love between a father and child is not ended by death. In a Catholic understanding of the Communion of Saints, it is relocated — and relocated, not erased.

For the fathers around you

If you are reading this not as a bereaved father but as someone who loves one: the research is clear that fathers are the most likely to be overlooked in pastoral accompaniment after the loss of a child. Francis wrote that to turn away from a grieving family 'would show a lack of mercy' and would 'close the door to other efforts at evangelization' [^1]. The man who has lost his child and received no one's sustained attention needs you to stay. Not to solve. Not to explain. To stay.

Do not assume he is fine because he went back to work. Do not assume he is coping because he is not weeping in public. Ask him about his child by name. Mention the child's name first — fathers in grief often report that the unbearable part is the silence around the name, the social awkwardness that causes people to speak around the child as though saying the name might break something. It will not break anything. It will open something.

Carrying this forward

Complicated grief is not a moral failure, and it is not a permanent sentence. Champion and Kilcullen's review points toward early, sustained, and specialized support as the most effective path — and that support works best when it is integrated with the other dimensions of a father's life: his marriage, his remaining children, his community, his faith.

For the father reading this who recognizes himself in these pages: your grief is the shape of your love, and your love is not disordered. The faith does not ask you to be finished grieving before you are finished grieving. It asks you to let yourself be accompanied — by a good counselor, by a trusted priest, by the men in your life who are willing to sit in the discomfort with you, and by a God who did not look away from the cross.

St. Joseph, who loved a child entrusted to his care with his whole life, who fled with him in danger and watched over his growing years in silence, is a patron worth invoking. He knew what it was to be a father whose heart was bound up in a child. The Church holds him before us not because his life was without anguish, but because his love held steady through what he could not control.

Your child was real. Your love for them was real. The grief is the proof of both. And it does not have to remain stuck where it is.

Footnotes

[^1]: Pope Francis, Amoris Laetitia (2016). The citations in this article draw on Francis's treatment of family grief and pastoral accompaniment in that document.

[^2]: Fifth General Conference of the Latin American and Caribbean Bishops, Aparecida Document (2007), §300. The Aparecida document, which Francis helped shape as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, situates the family as the primary locus of the transmission of life and faith.